• INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN AGAINST MICROPLASTIC INGREDIENTS IN COSMETICS - Supported by 96 NGOs from 40 countries and regions. Already 448 brands from 119 different manufacturers promised to remove plastic microbeads from their products.
  • Powered by Plastic Soup Foundation
Search
Search Menu

The BTMB campaign demands restriction of all intentionally added microplastics

Amsterdam, 11 May 2018 – Today holds the deadline for the ‘Call for evidence on the use of intentionally added microplastic particles in products of any kind.’ The European Chemical Agency (ECHA) is investigating, at the request of the European Commission, a need to restrict “the placing on the market and/or use of ‘intentionally added’ microplastic particles in products or uses that ‘intentionally release’ microplastic particles to the environment.” This means that if enough evidence is provided on the potential risks of microplastics to the environment and human health then ECHA might propose to the European Commission to restrict the use of ‘intentionally added microplastics.’

The Beat the Microbead (BTMB) campaign took this opportunity to provide ECHA with the years’ worth of campaigning and data accumulated via BTMB app. We summarised the data that we collected together with our partners under the RED product lists from different European countries in order to showcase the frequency and number of products that contain microplastic ingredients.

                         

The total number of European countries in our database is 12. Altogether, the RED lists of these 12 countries hold 1.327 products as per 10th April 2018. Out of these 1.327 products almost half contained polyethylene (PE) (610 products).

In the Netherlands, out of 226 entries under RED list, 90 products contained PE. Other than PE, Polystyrene/acrylates copolymer, Polyacrylate, Polyethylene-Glycol and Nylon were the most common microplastics found under the Dutch product list.

Along with these lists, we provided the scientific evidence of the presence of these microplastics in cosmetic and personal care products. Plastic Soup Foundation collaborated with the Free University of Amsterdam to test some products to see if and how these tiny plastic particles may look like. Out of 10 successful sampling, 6 products tested positive for microplastic ingredients. You can read the full report here!

We also submitted the position paper on microbeads and microplastics in cosmetics which we wrote and released in October 2017. In this position paper we urged EU:

  • To consider a ban on not only rinse-off products but also other kinds of cosmetics with microplastic ingredients.
  • To reconsider the current exemption of polymers from registration and evaluation under REACH.
  • And to issue and enforce a new EU regulation to ban all polymer ingredients that are persistent, bio-accumulative and/or toxic in ecosystems. This position paper was supported by 20 European NGOs.

The European Commission’s consideration of a restriction on intentionally added microplastics is a crucial first step but we want to stress that all microplastic ingredients should be under examination; regardless of the external dimension, water solubility, lower size limit of the substances and their function in leave-on and rinse-off products.

The Plastic Soup Foundation demands the general exemption of all polymers under REACH to be lifted. This means that all polymers should be registered as chemical substances so that they can be evaluated. If these polymers are shown to pose a potential risk to the environment or human health, they should be restricted.

You can read our full submission here!

Sponsored by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)

Powered by   Plastic Soup Foundation